First of all, I'd like to wish all of my readers a very happy Pride Month!, and if any readers can tell me how exactly Pride Month! differs from all the other months in which the new rainbow-with-a-funny-triangle flag is draped over every corporate surface this side of Kiev, I'll give you a free lifetime membership of the Exalted Order of Stone Heads.
Wait, Pride Month! was last month? Say what? Frankly, I find that disgustingly cisnormative. Pride Month should be 24 months a year, and anyone who objects that our own calendrical system only recognizes 12 distinct months is ignoring the fact that our calendrical system is, of course, racist.1
Which, it occurs to me, could be a good conceit to deploy by way of excuse for not having published anything last week, but, alas, it would be improper of me to cloak myself in such frivolity at such a grave time. The unrest on the other side of the Channel is a deeply ominous sign of the shape of Europe to come. As I was trying to convey in my series of articles on 'Embracing the Decline', any attentive student of history, unhindered by ideological blinkers, knows that mass migrations invariably go hand in hand with strife and, ultimately, warfare. It's not necessary to defame or aggrandise any specific ethnic groups to make this realization, although the assumption that this is the case is widespread. One can point fingers at who was colonized first, who was marginalized further, who throw the first stone at whom; none of it will matter a jot when the social fabric that holds a society together is torn to shreds and thrown to the wind. All that will matter will be how skilfully we respond, and adapt to a world that is utterly different from the one in which we were born.
In the background are the various factions of the 'elite' class jostling for position – Alex Krainer, for instance, speculates that the rift between Emmanuel Macron and the Anglo-American elites over NATO sabre-rattling may be the real reason for the outbreak of violence in France. Regardless of whether this is true or not, the unravelling of our civilization continues apace, and there isn't much we can do but brace ourselves.
Eugyppius makes an interesting point, in response to the notion that French rioters and climate-protesters represent some sort of new, revolutionary vanguard:
Protests about carbon emissions, racism and colonialist sins are not sincere demands for a better and more just world, but they are not the pretence of internal seditionists bent on the overthrow of the state either. They are rallying cries in support of the globalist programme, and an appeal to the issues via which our political elite aim to free themselves finally from the constraints of their own native populations.
I would suggest that the globalist elite are playing with fire – literally – if they are indeed making use of these angry young rioters, but I certainly don’t find it implausible: remember the pallets filled with bricks that were mysteriously left on the sidewalks during the 2020 BLM riots, or the fact that (according to Catherine Austin Fitts) all but two of the riot flashpoints were located close to BlackRock-owned banks. Regarding the climate psy-op, a smoking-gun lying within the pages of Klaus Schwab's Covid-19 and the Great Reset has only just come to my attention, via Lucy Wyatt's recent piece for Conservative Woman:
Schwab, in his Covid-19: The Great Reset published in June 2020, described his vision of Big Finance working hand-in-hand with activists: ‘Let’s imagine the following situation to illustrate the point: a group of green activists could demonstrate in front of a coal-fired power plant to demand greater enforcement of pollution regulations, while a group of investors does the same in the boardroom by depriving the plant access to capital.’ This is the plan: it’s a two-pronged attack; there is no ‘imagine’.
'Conscious' doesn't necessarily mean 'competent', though, and the counter-intuitive realisation I've had after three years of relentless psy-opping is that the elites are probably not as unified and definitely not as intelligent as I had previously thought. Davos Man has gone from the Project for a New American Century in the late 1990s to the 'multi-polar world order' – does this indicate that it's really all going to plan, or is it just akin to someone sheepishly muttering “ahah, ahum, well, I meant to do that” after slipping backwards on a geopolitical banana-skin? One thing is for sure; President Joe Biden lacks the presence of mind to even do that.
Developed as it was by the Babylonian Empire, a notorious white-supremacist organization.